We use cookies to understand how you use our site and to improve your experience.
This includes personalizing content and advertising.
By pressing "Accept All" or closing out of this banner, you consent to the use of all cookies and similar technologies and the sharing of information they collect with third parties.
You can reject marketing cookies by pressing "Deny Optional," but we still use essential, performance, and functional cookies.
In addition, whether you "Accept All," Deny Optional," click the X or otherwise continue to use the site, you accept our Privacy Policy and Terms of Service, revised from time to time.
You are being directed to ZacksTrade, a division of LBMZ Securities and licensed broker-dealer. ZacksTrade and Zacks.com are separate companies. The web link between the two companies is not a solicitation or offer to invest in a particular security or type of security. ZacksTrade does not endorse or adopt any particular investment strategy, any analyst opinion/rating/report or any approach to evaluating individual securities.
If you wish to go to ZacksTrade, click OK. If you do not, click Cancel.
Procter & Gamble Trades Near 52-Week Low: Buy, Hold or Sell?
Read MoreHide Full Article
Key Takeaways
Procter & Gamble hit a 52-week low of $144.09 amid weakening consumer demand and price pressures.
PG faces slower category growth, rising promotions and restructuring risks in North America and Europe.
PG projects FY26 organic sales to rise up to 4% and core EPS growth of 2-4% despite ongoing headwinds.
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG - Free Report) has shown a volatile performance in recent months, pressured by soft category consumption, rising promotional intensity and a challenging macro backdrop across key markets. The company faces mounting headwinds in North America and Europe, where consumers are growing more value-conscious and competitors are ramping up discounting. As a result, this Cincinnati, OH-based leading consumer goods company hit a new 52-week low of $144.09 on Nov. 10, 2025.
Currently trading at $148.54, the stock rebounded 3.1% from its 52-week low. However, the stock is 17.7% below its 52-week high of $180.43.
Notably, the Procter & Gamble stock has lost 11.4% year to date, slightly better than the broader industry’s 13% decline, but underperformed the Consumer Staples sector’s 1.9% dip. In contrast, the S&P 500 has rallied 18% in the same period.
Nevertheless, PG’s performance is notably stronger than that of its competitors, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL - Free Report) , The Clorox Company (CLX - Free Report) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD - Free Report) , which have declined 12.5%, 35.3% and 18.3%, respectively, in the year-to-date period.
Procter & Gamble YTD Stock Return
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
PG is trading below its 50 and 200-day moving averages, indicating a bearish outlook and challenges in sustaining the recent performance levels.
PG’s first-quarter fiscal 2026 results highlighted the company’s resilience but also underscored key structural and market challenges. Despite achieving 40 consecutive quarters of organic sales growth, the company is navigating a highly competitive and cautious consumer environment, especially in the United States and Europe. Category consumption has slowed, with intensified promotional activities in Fabric and Baby Care pressuring market share and margins.
PG’s value proposition is being tested as consumers increasingly seek sharper value amid inflationary pressures, forcing the company to balance pricing discipline with brand superiority and innovation-led differentiation.
Procter & Gamble faces the dual challenges of driving efficiency while managing the disruptive effects of its large-scale restructuring program. The company’s plan to eliminate up to 7,000 non-manufacturing roles and exit low-margin categories aims to enhance agility and cost structure. However, such transitions carry execution risks, including potential workforce disruption and temporary margin strain.
Additionally, ongoing supply chain optimization under “Supply Chain 3.0” requires significant investment to achieve the targeted $1.5 billion in cost savings, even as tariffs, commodity costs and geopolitical volatility continue to weigh on profitability.
Regionally, uneven performance adds complexity. While Latin America and Greater China showed encouraging growth, North America and Europe are grappling with stagnant volumes and intense pricing competition. Market share declines in several key segments and geographies reflect the need for sharper innovation cycles and stronger retailer partnerships. For PG, sustaining growth now hinges on flawlessly executing its integrated superiority strategy, balancing premium innovation, affordability and productivity gains, to preserve its market leadership in a demanding global landscape.
Although PG’s fiscal 2026 outlook remains muted, with organic sales projected to increase up to 4%, with core EPS growth of 2-4%. Higher tariff costs, commodity inflation and tax headwinds are expected to pressure margins, while softer consumption and intense competition weigh on near-term growth. The company anticipates a weak fiscal second quarter and plans to boost spending on innovation and competitiveness, which, though vital for long-term strength, will restrain short-term profitability.
PG’s Estimate Revision Trend
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s fiscal 2026 EPS inched up 0.4% in the last 30 days, while the same for fiscal 2027 EPS has moved down by a penny in the last seven days. The downward revision in earnings estimates indicates that analysts have been losing faith in the company’s growth potential.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PG’s fiscal 2026 sales and EPS suggests year-over-year growth of 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively. For fiscal 2027, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s sales and EPS implies 2.9% and 5.7% year-over-year growth, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
PG’s Valuation
Procter & Gamble is currently trading at a forward 12-month P/E multiple of 20.75X, exceeding the industry average of 18.29X but below the S&P 500’s average of 23.66X.
At 20.75X P/E, PG is trading at a valuation much higher than its competitors. Its competitors, such as Colgate and Clorox, are trading at lower multiples. Colgate and Clorox have forward 12-month P/E ratios of 20.68X and 16.81X — all lower than PG. Meanwhile, Church & Dwight trades at a forward P/E multiple of 22.92X, which is higher than PG.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Is PG a Good Investment Option Now?
Procter & Gamble is clearly in a tough spot, facing persistent headwinds with no clear near-term catalysts to drive a turnaround. The recent decrease in its stock price underscores weakening investor sentiment and concerns over sluggish demand, cost inflation and competitive pricing pressures. While the company’s restructuring and portfolio realignment initiatives aim to restore agility and long-term efficiency, the near-term environment remains challenging.
Moreover, its premium valuation limits an attractive entry opportunity for new investors, given muted earnings growth prospects. However, with a solid brand portfolio, consistent cash generation and ongoing innovation investments, PG remains well-positioned to recover once macro conditions stabilize. Investors already holding on to the stock may consider maintaining their positions in this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock, which indicates its potential for gradual long-term gains amid ongoing strategic execution.
Image: Bigstock
Procter & Gamble Trades Near 52-Week Low: Buy, Hold or Sell?
Key Takeaways
The Procter & Gamble Company (PG - Free Report) has shown a volatile performance in recent months, pressured by soft category consumption, rising promotional intensity and a challenging macro backdrop across key markets. The company faces mounting headwinds in North America and Europe, where consumers are growing more value-conscious and competitors are ramping up discounting. As a result, this Cincinnati, OH-based leading consumer goods company hit a new 52-week low of $144.09 on Nov. 10, 2025.
Currently trading at $148.54, the stock rebounded 3.1% from its 52-week low. However, the stock is 17.7% below its 52-week high of $180.43.
Notably, the Procter & Gamble stock has lost 11.4% year to date, slightly better than the broader industry’s 13% decline, but underperformed the Consumer Staples sector’s 1.9% dip. In contrast, the S&P 500 has rallied 18% in the same period.
Nevertheless, PG’s performance is notably stronger than that of its competitors, Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL - Free Report) , The Clorox Company (CLX - Free Report) and Church & Dwight Co., Inc. (CHD - Free Report) , which have declined 12.5%, 35.3% and 18.3%, respectively, in the year-to-date period.
Procter & Gamble YTD Stock Return
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
PG is trading below its 50 and 200-day moving averages, indicating a bearish outlook and challenges in sustaining the recent performance levels.
PG’s Stock Trades Below 50 & 200-Day Moving Averages
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Challenges Faced by Procter & Gamble
PG’s first-quarter fiscal 2026 results highlighted the company’s resilience but also underscored key structural and market challenges. Despite achieving 40 consecutive quarters of organic sales growth, the company is navigating a highly competitive and cautious consumer environment, especially in the United States and Europe. Category consumption has slowed, with intensified promotional activities in Fabric and Baby Care pressuring market share and margins.
PG’s value proposition is being tested as consumers increasingly seek sharper value amid inflationary pressures, forcing the company to balance pricing discipline with brand superiority and innovation-led differentiation.
Procter & Gamble faces the dual challenges of driving efficiency while managing the disruptive effects of its large-scale restructuring program. The company’s plan to eliminate up to 7,000 non-manufacturing roles and exit low-margin categories aims to enhance agility and cost structure. However, such transitions carry execution risks, including potential workforce disruption and temporary margin strain.
Additionally, ongoing supply chain optimization under “Supply Chain 3.0” requires significant investment to achieve the targeted $1.5 billion in cost savings, even as tariffs, commodity costs and geopolitical volatility continue to weigh on profitability.
Regionally, uneven performance adds complexity. While Latin America and Greater China showed encouraging growth, North America and Europe are grappling with stagnant volumes and intense pricing competition. Market share declines in several key segments and geographies reflect the need for sharper innovation cycles and stronger retailer partnerships. For PG, sustaining growth now hinges on flawlessly executing its integrated superiority strategy, balancing premium innovation, affordability and productivity gains, to preserve its market leadership in a demanding global landscape.
Although PG’s fiscal 2026 outlook remains muted, with organic sales projected to increase up to 4%, with core EPS growth of 2-4%. Higher tariff costs, commodity inflation and tax headwinds are expected to pressure margins, while softer consumption and intense competition weigh on near-term growth. The company anticipates a weak fiscal second quarter and plans to boost spending on innovation and competitiveness, which, though vital for long-term strength, will restrain short-term profitability.
PG’s Estimate Revision Trend
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s fiscal 2026 EPS inched up 0.4% in the last 30 days, while the same for fiscal 2027 EPS has moved down by a penny in the last seven days. The downward revision in earnings estimates indicates that analysts have been losing faith in the company’s growth potential.
The Zacks Consensus Estimate for PG’s fiscal 2026 sales and EPS suggests year-over-year growth of 3.2% and 2.6%, respectively. For fiscal 2027, the Zacks Consensus Estimate for Procter & Gamble’s sales and EPS implies 2.9% and 5.7% year-over-year growth, respectively.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
PG’s Valuation
Procter & Gamble is currently trading at a forward 12-month P/E multiple of 20.75X, exceeding the industry average of 18.29X but below the S&P 500’s average of 23.66X.
At 20.75X P/E, PG is trading at a valuation much higher than its competitors. Its competitors, such as Colgate and Clorox, are trading at lower multiples. Colgate and Clorox have forward 12-month P/E ratios of 20.68X and 16.81X — all lower than PG. Meanwhile, Church & Dwight trades at a forward P/E multiple of 22.92X, which is higher than PG.
Image Source: Zacks Investment Research
Is PG a Good Investment Option Now?
Procter & Gamble is clearly in a tough spot, facing persistent headwinds with no clear near-term catalysts to drive a turnaround. The recent decrease in its stock price underscores weakening investor sentiment and concerns over sluggish demand, cost inflation and competitive pricing pressures. While the company’s restructuring and portfolio realignment initiatives aim to restore agility and long-term efficiency, the near-term environment remains challenging.
Moreover, its premium valuation limits an attractive entry opportunity for new investors, given muted earnings growth prospects. However, with a solid brand portfolio, consistent cash generation and ongoing innovation investments, PG remains well-positioned to recover once macro conditions stabilize. Investors already holding on to the stock may consider maintaining their positions in this Zacks Rank #3 (Hold) stock, which indicates its potential for gradual long-term gains amid ongoing strategic execution.
You can see the complete list of today’s Zacks #1 Rank (Strong Buy) stocks here.